1
0
Fork 0
Commit graph

34 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ehofman
4fe886f008 Introduce a radar/in-range boolean property, end check this to see whether the CPU intensive radar calculations need to be done. If not, skip them. 2004-06-10 19:14:19 +00:00
ehofman
dda15ac488 David Culp:
Here's some additions to AI that allow refueling from an AI tanker (the actual
onload of fuel must be handled by the user's FDM of course, this just lets
the FDM know that the user is in position to refuel).

I've added a new class of AIAircraft called "tanker".  It uses the same
performance struct as a jet transport.  An AI tanker is just like an AI jet
transport, except it uses the already-existing radar data to control the
boolean property systems/refuel/contact.  The code change was minimal.

An AI tanker can be created like this:

  <entry>
   <callsign>Esso 1</callsign>
   <type>aircraft</type>
   <class>tanker</class>
   <model>Aircraft/737/Models/boeing733.xml</model>
   <latitude>37.61633</latitude>
   <longitude>-122.38334</longitude>
   <altitude>3000</altitude>
   <heading>020</heading>
   <speed>280</speed>
   <roll>-15</roll>
  </entry>

This puts a tanker over KSFO at 3000 feet, in a left-hand orbit.  When the
user gets within refueling range (contact position) then the property
systems/refuel/contact will be true.  Otherwise it is false.

The dimensions of the refueling envelope are pretty rough right now, but still
usable.  The user must be behind the tanker (ie. radar y_offset > 0).  The
user must be at or below the tanker's altitude (ie. radar elevation > 0).
The user's lat/lon must be within 250 feet of the tanker's lat/lon (ie. radar
range_ft < 250).  This last requirement is loose because the radar data is
only updated every 100 ms, which is accurate enough for radar use, but
which is sloppy for air refueling.  This could be tightened up by increasing
the radar update rate to once every sim cycle.

I'm going to add a light to the T-38 instrument panel that will monitor the
property systems/refuel/contact.  This will make it easier to explore the
boundaries of the refueling envelope.
2004-06-06 08:50:17 +00:00
ehofman
b3e9697262 Add the AIModel based air traffic subsystem from Durk Talsma. 2004-06-03 17:59:14 +00:00
ehofman
3c1a7174fb David Culp:
Here's some new AI stuff.

1)  AI objects must now be defined in a scenario file, not in preferences.xml
or a *-set file.  (Of course this doesn't prevent objects from being created
dynamically, as with Durk's traffic manager).

2)  A new demo_scenario file is attached.  It creates 3 aircraft, a sailboat,
and a thunderstorm.

3)  Objects without flightplans live forever.

4)  FGAIShip::ProcessFlightplan() is not yet implemented.

5)  preferences.xml should now define only <enabled> and <scenario>
2004-05-29 11:39:10 +00:00
ehofman
0074269d11 Fix a gxx 3.3 compiler problem. 2004-05-28 19:03:55 +00:00
ehofman
70a6f2c014 Use SGRawValueMethods rather than SGRawValueFunctions because that allows one to pass the 'this' pointer. Remove some debug code. 2004-05-28 08:46:33 +00:00
ehofman
b7acd97f2c Add the this pointer to the tied function calls. This makes it possible to make a distinction between the different aircraft models. 2004-05-27 13:16:53 +00:00
ehofman
20e35b175e Don't inline static functions. 2004-05-25 08:58:36 +00:00
ehofman
db22fb21c5 In the situation where a class gets deleted, the _slef pointer is set to 0. Make sure we check for that situation before using it. 2004-05-24 14:36:35 +00:00
ehofman
22cd6dfb2a David Culp:
1.  Removed aircraft roll on ground.
2.  Decreased descent pitch angle.
3.  Updated flightplans to include <on-ground>
4.  Fixed property indexing, so all AI aircraft have their own property branch


The default value of <on-ground> is false, so you only need to specify it when
on the ground.  For takeoff you need to specify <on-ground>true</on-ground>
for the first waypoint, and for the acceleration waypoint.  For landing you
need to specify it for the touchdown point and any taxi points.


One problem.  WARNING **** There is a bug in the way the property system
works, which causes a segfault, but I don't know if the problem is in the
property code, or in how I'm using it.  After an AI object terminates, if you
access the property tree through the property browser the sim will segfault.
2004-05-21 16:50:19 +00:00
ehofman
8beb280625 Oops, change type. 2004-05-19 14:10:31 +00:00
ehofman
4d3e523f90 Add AI models enableing/disableing command line option and support code. 2004-05-19 13:55:49 +00:00
ehofman
0fda8efa03 Reduce the update delay from 500 ms to 100 ms. 2004-05-19 08:12:21 +00:00
ehofman
eb0b1492a2 Fred found some iterated related problems. With a bit of luck this solves the segmentation fault problem. 2004-05-19 08:01:02 +00:00
ehofman
009fa7371d Some small updates that hopefully solve the segmentation fault at the end of the flightplan. 2004-05-18 09:09:08 +00:00
ehofman
0fd9f0a704 David Culp:
First, preferences.xml will define the scenario filename.

For now, the other way of defining ai objects still works, so the sailboat
stays in preferences.xml.  Later, I'll move the sailboat into the demo
scenario.  If no scenario filename is given, then no scenario will be
processed.

I changed the demo scenario to create two 737's, one takes off on runway 01L,
and the other takes off on runway 01R.  This will make a good demo for the ai
system.  One problem, if you takeoff on 28L/R right away, you might run into
the taking-off 737's, or be scared.
2004-05-17 08:45:33 +00:00
ehofman
c3c61ae657 Use lower case letters instead. 2004-05-15 12:46:25 +00:00
ehofman
1dfe93d550 David Culp:
Here's the newest AI stuff.

The AIManager at init() creates a new scenario.  Right now the
default_scenario is hard coded in, but eventually the AIManager should get
the scenario filename from preferences.xml.

The scenario defines which AI objects will be created.  Right now it only
creates AIAircraft, but this is easily extended.  The scenario also defines
which flightplan will be assigned to the airplane.  Scenario config files go
in data/Data/AI.

The Airplane gets a pointer to a FlightPlan object.  Each airplane should get
its own flightplan object, even if two airplanes have the same flight plan.
This is because  the flightplan maintains the iterator pointing to the
current waypoint, and two airplanes might be at different locations (for
instance if they were created at different times).  The flight plan files go
in data/Data/AI/FlightPlans.

When the airplane gets to the waypoint named "END" it vanishes.  The
AIAircraft destructor deletes its flight plan (if it has one).

The last waypoint is a place holder only.  I called mine
<WPT><NAME>"EOF"</NAME></WPT>.
2004-05-15 09:07:55 +00:00
curt
2acdd02879 Clean up various compiler warnings that have crept into the code. This
by no means get's them all, but it's a start.
2004-04-01 15:27:53 +00:00
ehofman
6a08c79fcc David Culp:
I added some things to the AI stuff to improve the AIThermal processing.
Before, all the thermals were processed in order, and the last one overwrote
the prior one.  Now, only the data from the nearest thermal is kept.  This
way a tile can be populated with many thermals, and (as long as they have the
same diameter) the one nearest the airplane correctly takes effect.  This
will make us ready for the next step, "auto-thermaling", where FlightGear's
tile manager can cover a tile with thermals, and set the thermal strength
based on land-use type.

I moved the enumerated object_type to the base class.  When an AI object is
created it now sets the _otype variable in the base class.  This lets the AI
manager find out what kind of AI object it is dealing with, using the base
pointer.  I also added a function isa() to the base class, so the manager can
process objects differently based on their type.

The AI manager now sends AIThermal processing to a different function, where
only the data from the nearest thermal is kept.  After the manager processes
all the AI objects, then the results from the nearest thermal are applied to
wind-from-down.
2004-03-07 12:08:46 +00:00
ehofman
250ccf7bff Put the Thermal and Storm support code back in 2004-03-03 20:33:08 +00:00
ehofman
ed4509d8b5 Put the AIStorm and AIThermal classes back in 2004-03-03 20:26:06 +00:00
ehofman
85a1e5cc98 David Culp:
Here's a new batch of AI code which includes a working radar instrument.

I put the radar calculations into the existing AIAircraft class.  It was
easier that way, and it can always be migrated out later if we have to.
Every tenth sim cycle the AIManager makes a copy of the current user state
information.  When the AIAircraft updates it uses this information to
calculate the radar numbers.  It calculates:

1) bearing from user to target
2) range to target in nautical miles
3) "horizontal offset" to target.  This is the angle from the nose to the
   target, in degrees, from -180 to 180.  This will be useful later for a HUD.
4) elevation, in degrees (vertical angle from user's position to target
   position)
5) vertical offset, in degrees (this is elevation corrected for user's pitch)
6) rdot (range rate in knots, note:  not working yet, so I commented it out)

and three items used by the radar instrument to place the "blip"

7) y_shift, in nautical miles
8) x_shift, in nautical miles
9) rotation, in degrees

The radar instrument uses the above three items, and applies a scale factor to
the x-shift and y-shift in order to match the instrument's scale.  Changing
the display scale can be done entirely in the XML code for the instrument.
Right now it's set up only to display a 40 mile scale.

The radar is an AWACS view, which is not very realistic, but it is useful and
demonstrates the technology.  With just a little more work I can get a HUD
marker.  All I need to do there is make a bank angle adjustment to the
current values.
2004-02-27 10:20:17 +00:00
ehofman
4b424a29e7 David Culp:
I went through the AI code to put the "bank" node back into the config file,
so the models can fly circles.  While I was in there I made some other
changes.

*)  Moved the initialization of roll, tgt-roll, pitch ... etc, from init()
into the constructor, so it wouldn't over-write the config settings.

*)  Changed the altitude getter to remove the meters-to-feet conversion.  The
altitude is kept internally in feet.  Only the scenery code needs meters.

*)  Added "bank" item for config file (for type=aircraft).  Left bank is
negative.

*)  Added "rudder" item for config file (for type=ship).  Left rudder is
negative.  Internally this is stored in the "roll" variable, but the ship
model doesn't roll.  It uses the "roll" variable for turning though.


The following puts a tanker at 3000 feet, 6 nm northwest of KSFO.  On takeoff,
the tanker is visible over the hanger building at one-o'clock.

   <entry>
    <type>aircraft</type>
    <class>jet_transport</class>
    <path>Aircraft/737/Models/boeing733.xml</path>
    <speed-KTAS type="double">320.0</speed-KTAS>
    <altitude-ft type="double">3000.0</altitude-ft>
    <longitude type="double">-122.455</longitude>
    <latitude type="double">37.69667</latitude>
    <heading type="double">200.0</heading>
    <bank type="double">-15.0</bank>
   </entry>
2004-02-23 20:55:07 +00:00
ehofman
863b0c9432 Make the AI models a bit more intelligent. The Gear should be extended and retracted automatically, the navigation lights turn on when sun-angle-rad > 1.57, strobe and beacon are always on and make sure all properties are returned in the right unit format. 2004-01-22 21:13:47 +00:00
ehofman
5a6858609d Fix a typo 2003-12-22 20:18:33 +00:00
ehofman
2d7a6e475d Split up model[] into ship[], aircraft[], ballistic[] and model[] (for unspecified models). 2003-12-22 12:30:35 +00:00
ehofman
298f53edef Tidy up the code a bit more, move /ai/model[] to /ai/models/model[] and make sure there can be more than one model subtree. 2003-12-22 10:24:15 +00:00
ehofman
c1eb54ae0a Use some C++ FOOmagic to get the lat and lon updated in the property tree properly 2003-12-21 22:16:57 +00:00
ehofman
9bc2517417 Make the AI model export it's internal state to the property tree under /ai/model[] using the same naming convention as used for the regular FDM. Also make sure the model animations are relative the the /ai/model[] node. 2003-12-21 20:12:55 +00:00
ehofman
4c01e0e76a Tidy up the code a bit 2003-12-21 13:42:01 +00:00
ehofman
a9c6ca26af Don't destroy the elements ourselves. Instead clear
() calls the destructor for each element itself.
2003-11-28 20:16:59 +00:00
ehofman
3297ac3544 Some small updates 2003-11-28 20:05:32 +00:00
ehofman
cd0c447b43 Add David Culp's AI model manager code which is derived from David Luff's AI/ATC code. 2003-11-28 15:48:05 +00:00