Attached is a patched runways.cxx. This fixes the find runway nearest to a given heading code. This was returning the last runway loaded at a given airport, not the nearest runway to the heading requested (which seems to always be 270deg by default). I have no idea how this has survived unnoticed for so long - I think it might be because you need to start at an airport with a runway near to 27 and one much greater than 27 eg. 36 to really tickle it, otherwise the runway nearest to 27 tends to be the final one loaded anyway. Try starting at KARR with and without the patch and note the surface wind. This should go in before the release.
a single apt.dat.gz file which is in the native X-Plane format.
To do this I wrote a front end loader than builds the airport and runway
list. Some of the changes I needed to make had a cascading effect, so there
are minor naming changes scattered throughout the code.
Okay, here's the latest update to the tarffic manager/AI Manager. AITraffic
can now fly multiple routes and be initialized while sitting statically at
airports.
These change add some code that at initialization time will snap all
localizers into perfect alignment with their runways. It's my experience
that the DAFIF/FAA data reports runway and localizer headings to a level
of precision that is great for making charts, or adjusting your OBS, etc.
But the level of precision of this data can be far enough off to make you
visibly *un*aligned with the runway when the CDI needle is centered.
There are probably cases where the localizer isn't really perfectly
aligned with the runway, or intentionally misaligned to avoid obstacles
or terrain. So I have made this configurable for those that trust the
data more than I do. Just set "/sim/navdb/auto-align-localizers" to
true/false in the preferences file to turn this feature on or off in the
code.
Firstly, the search of a given runway number was coming out wrong if the
reverse of the one actually in the database was given, resulting in the AI
plane going to the wrong runway. This was caused by the fact that if the
reverse runway number to the one wanted was matched then revrwyno was
assigned to rwy.rwy_no, whereas actually it was the original runwayno that
should have been assigned.
Secondly, whilst instrumenting the search with couts to see what was going
wrong, I noticed that one runway would come up loads of times. It turns
out that this is because taxiways and the next airport line were loaded in
as the last runway, with only the type changed, in the constructor. Thus
the total number of runway entries for all except the last airport equalled
(no-of-runways + no-of-taxiways + 1). I've changed a couple of lines to
fix this.
[Curt: this was partially fixed last week, but now it should be completely
fixed. Thanks Dave!]
I've fixed a bug in FGRunways::search(aptid, tgt_hdg) which wasn't working properly for airports with multiple parallel runways. I've also firmed up and pulled out into it's own function the GetReverseRunwayNo code, and done some input checking.
As a result of fixing the above in runways.cxx, I've pulled out the
parallel implementation in the functions that set position by airport and
heading/runway number in fg_init.cxx and called the runways functions
instead.
// search for the specified apt id and runway no
bool FGRunways::search( const string& aptid, const string& rwyno, FGRunway*
r )
there was a bug, in that each runway corresponds to *two* runway numbers
(eg 01/19, 10L/28R) but the function was only checking one. I've modified
it to check the supplied number against both possible numbers for each
runway.
Secondly, I sent in the function:
// Return the runway closest to a given heading
bool FGRunways::search( const string& aptid, const int tgt_hdg,
FGRunway* runway )
a year or two ago now when I first did the ATIS. I'm not sure what I was
doing at the time (copied most of it out of fg_init.cxx) but I don't think
it's ever worked, so here's a brutal modification that does!
Some more cmall changes to the SimGear header files and removed the
SG_HAVE_NATIVE_SGI_COMPILERS dependancies from FlightGear.
I've added a seperate JSBSim patch for the JSBSim source tree.
It seems that the airport database was changed some day and the End?Flags
changed from floats to strings. The database definition, though, was not
adapted and still created number entries. Reading out these flags led to
access to memory, that was never initialized. While it didn't cause crashes
during normal use, it actually caused one when I ran fgfs in ddd. Seems,
that the concerned memory region wasn't zeroed out then and hence uncovered
the bug.
Of course, the runways.mk4 database has to be re-created with the new
definitions.
