data. The script is growing though to incorportate other data sources
so the name will probably have to change. DAFIFT is missing many
approaches (for instance it only has 6 approaches from the entirety of
Canada.) This is not yet ready for prime time, I'm simply committing it
to the repository so I can check it out and work on it from multiple
locations.
clearly the date of installation at that particular offset. Offsets are
usually not changed because this would imply moving intersection points,
fixes, changing approaches, and all sorts of cascading effects. GEP near
my house hasn't been adjusted since 1965; it is now about 8 degrees off the
real current magvar.
appears still to be indicating.
Added a 'caged' property to the AI, for aerobatic work.
Temporarily disabled tumbling due to pitch, until I can learn more
about it.
Publish the current amount of tumble (-1.0:1.0) under
/instrumentation/attitude-indicator/tumble-norm.
Set a random value for a numeric property
Params:
<property> - the name of the property to randomize
<min> - the minimum allowed value
<max> - the maximum allowed value
The one to fg_init.cxx initialises the AI subsystem regardless of whether it's enabled or not so that later enabling by the user doesn't crash it, and the one to main.cxx avoids running the ATC manager and ATC display system unless enabled.
proceed to search for an VOR of that same frequency. On rare occasion
this search could return true with a far distant VOR and cause a small
amount of confusion.
I believe.) :-)
- The height of the navaid was not being properly converted to meters
before being used in our internal calculations. This caused the GS
to be placed too high.
- I was using the wrong trig function to calculate the current approach
angle of the aircraft. The distance to the GS source is the euclidean
point to point distance and represents the hypotenuse (not the ground
distance) so I need to use asin() rather than atan() to calculate the
angle.
- I was calculating distance directly to the GS source, rather than
taking into consideration that the GS transmitter projects a plane,
so I need to take the distance to the line where that plane intersectso
the ground. Previously, the way I modeled my distance calculation, the
GS transmitter effectively formed a 3 degree cone from the source. The GS
transmitter is usually placed a 100 meters or so off the runway edge so
the cone model could never bring you in to the touch down point precisely.
With these changes, the GS will bring you in precisely to the touchdown
point as defined in the default.ils.gz file (it wouldn't before.) The only
issue that remains is that it will bring you in to the elevation defined
in the ILS database, which doesn't necessarily match the DEM/SRTM terrain
at that point. Still on average, this will be a big improvement until we
can do a better job of getting the runway end elevations nailed correctly.
