1
0
Fork 0
Commit graph

20 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ehofman
4df7a3e9f8 Mathias Fröhlich:
I have introduced the posibility to start directly on the carrier.

With that patch you will have a --carrrier=id argument where id can either be
the pennant number configured in the nimitz scenario or the carriers name
also configured in the carriers scenario.
Additionaly you can use --parkpos=id to select different positions on the
carrier. They are also configured in the scenario file.

That includes the switch of the whole FGInterface class to make use of the
groundcache.
That means that an aircraft no longer uses the current elevation value from
the scenery class. It rather has its own local cache of the aircrafts
environment which is setup in the common_init method of FGInterface and
updated either manually by calling
 FGInterface::get_groundlevel_m(lat, lon, alt_m);
or implicitly by calling the above method in the
 FGInterface::_updateGeo*Position(lat, lon, alt);
methods.
A call get_groundlevel_m rebuilds the groundcache if the request is outside
the range of the cache.

Note that for the real usage of the groundcache including the correct
information about the movement of objects and the velocity information, you
still need to set up the groundcache in the usual way like YASim and JSBSim
currently does.
If you use the native interface, you will get only static objects correctly.
But for FDM's only using one single ground level for a whole step this is IMO
sufficient.

The AIManager gets a way to return the location of a object which is placed
wrt an AI Object. At the moment it only honours AICarriers for that.
That method is a static one, which loads the scenario file for that reason and
throws it away afterwards. This looked like the aprioriate way, because the
AIManager is initialized much later in flightgears bootstrap, and I did not
find an easy way to reorder that for my needs. Since this additional load is
very small and does only happen if such a relative location is required, I
think that this is ok.

Note that moving on the carrier will only work correctly for JSBSim and YASim,
but you should now be able to start and move on every not itself moving
object with any FDM.
2005-07-03 09:39:14 +00:00
curt
d0c8edd02d Fix a misuse of a return value that lead to an error message being displayed
when one shouldn't have been.
2005-06-14 17:53:40 +00:00
curt
86249209b9 This is a work in progress. I am extending the "ExternalPipe" protocol to
have a "property" mode as well as the original "binary" mode.  The property mode
will allow the remote module to request any set of properties, and it will send
those properties each frame.  The remote module can reply with a list of arbitrary
property name/value pairs to update on the FlightGear side.

This is a first stab, so it's not the cleanest, most well concieved code, but it
allows an external module (communicating via a pipe) to have a huge amount of
flexibility in the data in can access and update.
2005-04-19 01:44:56 +00:00
curt
5783208d9d Fix a "signededness" error. 2005-02-15 18:07:06 +00:00
curt
d05121ef46 Fix my mailing address by replacing it with my web page. 2004-11-19 22:10:41 +00:00
curt
944a82b576 Clean up some sound buffer allocation/deallocation issues. 2004-05-10 21:24:30 +00:00
curt
795abb81a4 Change the message passing structure just a bit in order to remove a possible
time dependency ambiguity on the remote end.
2004-04-20 22:53:38 +00:00
curt
b5c9a3c0e2 Clean up some debugging output. 2004-04-02 16:17:08 +00:00
curt
2acdd02879 Clean up various compiler warnings that have crept into the code. This
by no means get's them all, but it's a start.
2004-04-01 15:27:53 +00:00
curt
a37515d7fe Add support for passing a CG offset (in inches) to an external FDM. 2003-11-13 03:10:09 +00:00
curt
23c1057a19 Add support for sending out a requested aircraft weight to an external FDM
via the "pipe" interface.
2003-11-10 21:56:32 +00:00
curt
562ce6f5e2 Ooops, I added another item to what I write to the buffer, but
forgot to make it big enough to hold the new item.  This was manifesting
itself as a crash on reset (if the ExternalPipe FDM was being used.)
2003-08-01 17:06:11 +00:00
curt
419f09f804 Curt:
I have added a fledgling replay system that records flight data and control
positions during the flight.

I have added an internal command called "replay" which will trigger a replay
of the entire saved flight data set.  This could be bound to a keyboard or
menu command, in fact this entire module is screaming for someone to build
a gui to control playback speed, amount of playback, etc.

This is the initial version so there are kinks that still need to be worked
out, please be patient.
2003-07-17 18:24:17 +00:00
ehofman
e3bcb4b619 MingW 0.92 fixes 2003-06-08 12:01:43 +00:00
curt
2c20e61b4b Removed some extraneous debugging output. 2003-03-09 12:48:29 +00:00
david
4b78f5305f Ignore generated files. 2003-03-09 03:21:34 +00:00
curt
92cfd383d6 Remove std:: 2003-03-04 00:25:35 +00:00
curt
11e0a3b1f8 Don't remove the named pipe on a "Reset" or position change (i.e. when
FGExternalPipe is destructed.)  This leaves the name pipe hanging around
even after flightgear exits, but assuming we put the files in /tmp that
shouldn't be a big deal.
2003-03-03 17:48:09 +00:00
curt
dbf7218c63 A small optimization, pass the number of iterations to the remote end and
have it do all the work, rather than calling the remote end "iteration"
number of times.
2003-03-03 04:59:41 +00:00
curt
cc269730a5 First stab at a "named pipe" interface to an external FDM. Compared to the
ExternalNet interface:

- allows a much more closely coupled execution.  A remote network FDM will run
  at it's own rate, and maybe a particular data packets will come, maybe it
  won't.  This makes it very hard to control timing and keep the animation
  smooth.  There are also cpu scheduling issues with running multiple
  processes on a single machine.  The linux scheduler by default runs at
  100hz.  If an FDM process uses a sleep/alarm system to avoid wasting
  CPU, it will be forced to run at 100hz, 50hz, 25hz, 20hz, etc.  This
  makes it *impossible* to serve a display system running at 60hz without
  dropping frames.

- the downside is that the FDM process must now run on the same machine as
  the master flightgear process.
2003-03-03 04:30:16 +00:00