Lee Elliot:
>> Hello List, >> >> I think there's a small bug in the moving-average filter in >> xmlauto.cxx >> >> I noticed that the output from it was always out a bit and >> checking with a calculator showed that it seemed to be dividing >> by the number of samples + 1 instead of just the number of >> samples. >> >> subtracting 1 from 'samples' in line 702 seems to fix the problem >> and as 'samples' doesn't seem to be used elsewhere I think it's >> safe. Possibly implies that the number of samples may be one >> less than specified but I'm not familiar enough with c++ to spot >> it. Roy Ovesen: You are right. I would suggest resizing input[] to (samples + 1) instead. Change lines 654 and 661 to: input.resize(samples + 1, 0.0); That way we average over the number of samples as configured.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e17bc29986
commit
e60223a952
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -651,14 +651,14 @@ FGDigitalFilter::FGDigitalFilter(SGPropertyNode *node)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
output.resize(2, 0.0);
|
||||
input.resize(samples, 0.0);
|
||||
input.resize(samples + 1, 0.0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void FGDigitalFilter::update(double dt)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ( input_prop != NULL ) {
|
||||
input.push_front(input_prop->getDoubleValue());
|
||||
input.resize(samples, 0.0);
|
||||
input.resize(samples + 1, 0.0);
|
||||
// no sense if there isn't an input :-)
|
||||
enabled = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue