fly/flightgear
1
0
Fork 0
Code Activity

bugfix

Browse source 
Patrice Poly:
After investigation, it appears that the probes are reversed due to a
little mistake when someone changed how the probe calculations are made.
probe 0 is under the plane. probe 4 should be downwind, probes 1,2 and 3 should be upwind.
This commit is contained in:
torsten 2010-01-22 17:00:32 +00:00 committed by Tim Moore
parent 2a29c8c604
commit ac90d8ff8a
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/Environment/ridge_lift.cxx
View file

@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void FGRidgeLift::update(double dt) {
// position is geodetic, need geocentric for advanceRadM // position is geodetic, need geocentric for advanceRadM
SGGeod myGeodPos = SGGeod::fromDegM( probe_lon_deg[0], probe_lat_deg[0], 20000.0 ); SGGeod myGeodPos = SGGeod::fromDegM( probe_lon_deg[0], probe_lat_deg[0], 20000.0 );
SGGeoc myGeocPos = SGGeoc::fromGeod( myGeodPos ); SGGeoc myGeocPos = SGGeoc::fromGeod( myGeodPos );
double ground_wind_from_rad = _surface_wind_from_deg_node->getDoubleValue() * SG_DEGREES_TO_RADIANS + SG_PI; double ground_wind_from_rad = _surface_wind_from_deg_node->getDoubleValue() * SG_DEGREES_TO_RADIANS;
// compute the remaining probes // compute the remaining probes
for (unsigned i = 1; i < sizeof(probe_elev_m)/sizeof(probe_elev_m[0]); i++) { for (unsigned i = 1; i < sizeof(probe_elev_m)/sizeof(probe_elev_m[0]); i++) {